No one who’s ever looked for an apartment in D.C. needs to told that there’s an affordable housing problem here.
According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, housing is affordable if it costs no more than one-third of income. By this standard, rental costs are unaffordable for nearly two-thirds of D.C. households that rent.
In fact, a person earning the current minimum wage would have to work nearly 158 hours per week to afford a modest two-bedroom apartment here. No wonder so many people are homeless or going without basic necessities like nutritious food and medicine just to keep a roof over their heads.
The District can do something about this problem. It can put more money into its affordable housing programs. Instead, the City Council recently cut funding for two of the major programs.
But, as Marc Fischer pointed out in his Washington Post column, providing housing for homeless people costs far less than the alternatives–emergency room visits, incarceration in jails or mental hospitals, overnight shelters, rescues of people who are freezing to death.
Some members of the City Council think the affordable housing budget cuts are worth a second look. Let’s hope the whole Council sees that it is being pennywise and pound foolish.
— Kathryn
Pennywise Budget Cuts
Published November 30, 2008 Political Animal , Social Commentary , Sustainable Cities 1 CommentTags: affordable housing, budget, City Council, Council, DC, district of columbia, homeless, homelessness, housing, washington dc
No one who’s ever looked for an apartment in D.C. needs to told that there’s an affordable housing problem here.
According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, housing is affordable if it costs no more than one-third of income. By this standard, rental costs are unaffordable for nearly two-thirds of D.C. households that rent.
In fact, a person earning the current minimum wage would have to work nearly 158 hours per week to afford a modest two-bedroom apartment here. No wonder so many people are homeless or going without basic necessities like nutritious food and medicine just to keep a roof over their heads.
The District can do something about this problem. It can put more money into its affordable housing programs. Instead, the City Council recently cut funding for two of the major programs.
But, as Marc Fischer pointed out in his Washington Post column, providing housing for homeless people costs far less than the alternatives–emergency room visits, incarceration in jails or mental hospitals, overnight shelters, rescues of people who are freezing to death.
Some members of the City Council think the affordable housing budget cuts are worth a second look. Let’s hope the whole Council sees that it is being pennywise and pound foolish.
— Kathryn